添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:
生成式人工智能与学习平台的深度介入,使教育运行逻辑由课堂组织转向平台组织,同步性与异步性由此演变为两种不同的教育时间制度。本文以富兰克林“整体性技术”与“规范性技术”为起点,结合后人类理论,考察AI时代同步与异步教育的生成逻辑。研究发现:同步教育维护共享时间中的教育生成,异步教育则体现平台化的程序时间,二者深层冲突实为生成性时间与可编程时间、教育公共性与个体化服务、分布式行动力与不可转让责任之间的张力。据此,本文提出“教育节律正义”,主张依据教育活动性质重新配置同步与异步结构,以重建AI时代教育的公共性与生成性。
人工智能;同步性教育;异步性教育;后人类理论;教育时间;教育节律正义
The deep integration of generative artificial intelligence and learning platforms has shifted the operational logic of education from classroom organisation to platform organisation, transforming synchrony and asynchrony into two distinct regimes of educational time. Drawing on Ursula Franklin’s distinction between “holistic technologies” and “prescriptive technologies,” and incorporating posthumanist theoretical resources, this paper examines the generative logic of synchronous and asynchronous education in the AI era. The study finds that synchronous education sustains educational generation within shared temporality, whereas asynchronous education increasingly embodies platformbased programmable time. The underlying conflict is not a choice between the two formats, but rather the tensions between generative time and programmable time, between educational publicness and individualised services, and between distributed agency and nontransferable responsibility. Accordingly, this paper proposes the concept of “Temporal Justice of Education,” advocating for the reconfiguration of synchronous and asynchronous structures according to the nature of educational activities, so as to rebuild the publicness and generativity of education in the age of artificial intelligence.
Artificial Intelligence; Synchronous education; Asynchronous Education; Posthuman theory; Educational time; Temporal justice of education
席宇哲. 后人类时代教育冲突:技术真相下同步与异步的再审视[J]. 人文与社会科学学刊. 2026, 2 (8): 94-99. DOI: 10.70693/202607134406.
席宇哲. (2026). 后人类时代教育冲突:技术真相下同步与异步的再审视. 人文与社会科学学刊, 2 (8), 94-99. https://doi.org/10.70693/202607134406