当前位置:中国现代教育学报 > 2026年9-10月-2卷5期 > 文章详情
Open Access Crossmark - Check for updates
PDF

生成式AI辅助大学教育的机遇与风险:课堂融入策略与实施路径

Opportunities and Risks of Generative AI-Assisted University Education: Classroom Integration Strategies and Implementation Pathways

作者:董晓瑜,李烨,步国星,谭铭元
单位:烟台南山学院,东新大学
卷期:2026年9-10月-2卷5期
页码:178-183
发布时间:2026-10-09
总浏览量:201

摘要

生成式人工智能在教学内容生成、学习支持、作业反馈与课堂互动等环节的快速普及,使大学教育在获得效率提升空间的同时面临新的课堂治理与质量保障挑战。本文从机遇与风险的双重视角出发指出:生成式AI有助于提升学习支持与反馈效率,促进差异化学习与自主学习,并优化课堂互动与学习体验;但其也可能引发学术诚信风险与学习成果真实性弱化、学习主体性削弱与认知投入不足,以及生成内容可靠性不足导致的核验成本上升等问题。基于高校教师课堂实践需求,本文提出生成式AI融入大学课堂的实施路径:构建允许—限制—禁止的情境化使用规则,推动任务设计由“直接生成”转向“可评价的学习活动”,以过程性证据建设重建学习证据链,并通过形成性评价与结果评价的组合引导学生投入真实学习过程,同时配套教师发展、资源配置与制度规范等支持保障,以实现生成式AI在大学教育中的有序应用与质量提升。

关键词

生成式人工智能;大学教育;课堂融入;高校教师;教学治理

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of generative artificial intelligence in areas such as teaching content generation, learning support, assignment feedback, and classroom interaction has provided university education with opportunities for enhanced efficiency while simultaneously posing new challenges in classroom governance and quality assurance. From the dual perspective of opportunities and risks, this paper points out that generative AI can help improve the efficiency of learning support and feedback, promote differentiated and self-directed learning, and optimize classroom interaction and learning experience. However, it may also lead to risks such as academic integrity issues and the weakening of learning outcome authenticity, the diminishment of learner agency and insufficient cognitive engagement, as well as increased verification costs due to insufficient reliability of generated content. Based on the practical needs of university teachers in classroom instruction, this paper proposes implementation pathways for integrating generative AI into university classrooms: establishing contextualized usage rules encompassing "permitted," "restricted," and "prohibited" scenarios; shifting task design from "direct generation" towards "evaluable learning activities"; reconstructing the learning evidence chain through the collection of procedural evidence; and guiding students to engage in authentic learning processes through a combination of formative and summative assessments. Concurrently, supporting safeguards such as teacher development, resource allocation, and institutional norms should be implemented to achieve the orderly application and quality enhancement of generative AI in university education.

Keywords

Generative Artificial Intelligence; University Education; Classroom Integration; University Teachers; Teaching Governance

引用本文

董晓瑜,李烨,步国星,谭铭元. 生成式AI辅助大学教育的机遇与风险:课堂融入策略与实施路径[J]. 中国现代教育学报. 2026, 2 (5): 178-183. DOI: 10.70693/202610091993.

APA引用

董晓瑜, 李烨, 步国星, 谭铭元. (2026). 生成式AI辅助大学教育的机遇与风险:课堂融入策略与实施路径. 中国现代教育学报, 2 (5), 178-183. https://doi.org/10.70693/202610091993

参考文献

[1]蔡基刚.人工智能时代大学教什么?从AI赋能教学到AI重塑教育[J/OL].天津外国语大学学报,1-9[2026-01-06].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/12.1422.H.20251225.0912.008.
[2]周馥郁.AI赋能大学英语课程思政“教—学—评一体化”体系构建[J].三角洲,2025,(35):93-95.
[3]黄莉.从工具积累到深度学习生态:基于SAMR-TPACK模型的大学英语智慧课堂技术适配演进综述[J].湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版),2025,22(12):152-156.
[4]罗金妮.AI赋能下传媒艺术类学生大学英语听说教学创新改革研究[J].山西青年,2025,(22):108-110.
[5]李广海,王慧莹,刘佳.“AI”技术应用到大学英语课程的教学研究[J].湖北开放职业学院学报,2025,38(22):150-152.
[6]齐奕霖.生成式人工智能赋能下大学英语阅读教学模式创新研究[C]//河南省民办教育协会.2025年高等教育发展论坛教改分论坛论文集(下册).成都艺术职业大学;,2025:45-47.DOI:10.26914/c.cnkihy.2025.059944.
[7]徐飞,傅丽芳,田隽瑶.“新工科+新农科”背景下农业数学模型教学改革实践探索——以东北农业大学为例[J].教育观察,2025,14(31):21-23.DOI:10.16070/j.cnki.cn45-1388/g4s.2025.31.022.
[8]黄巨臣,王一栋.从“AI排斥”到“AI创能”:人工智能在大学教学中的应用深化[J].中国高教研究,2025,(04):34-41.DOI:10.16298/j.cnki.1004-3667.2025.04.05.
[9]鲁世林.DeepSeek对大学教师教学的冲击及反思[J].高等理科教育,2025,(02):10-12+16.
[10]钟生根.ChatGPT对大学管理学课程教学的挑战与应对[J].科教文汇,2024,(08):129-132.DOI:10.16871/j.cnki.kjwh.2024.08.030.
[11]范春蕾,武荷岚,解希顺.试论ChatGPT对大学基础课教学的影响[J].物理与工程,2023,33(04):7-11+17.
CC BY 本文依据 知识共享署名 4.0 国际许可协议 授权发布。允许他人在署名原作者及来源的前提下复制、传播和使用本文。

编辑部微信

回到顶部