绿色信用体系是在绿色低碳转型背景下形成的信用治理安排,其核心问题是绿色表现如何经由信息归集、信用化处理和场景应用转化为可核验、可解释、可使用的信用信号。既有研究主要讨论绿色信贷政策效应、环境信用监管和企业绿色创新,对绿色信用信息在公共信用、金融信用和市场信用之间的转换机制关注不足。本文在信息不对称、制度经济学和社会信用治理理论基础上,提出“绿色表现—信息归集—信用化处理—评价形成—场景应用—行为反馈”的分析链条。研究认为,绿色信用体系并非一般企业信用评价的绿色化附加项,而是对信用信息边界、评价逻辑和应用范围的扩展。浙江案例显示,绿色金融改革试验区、公共信用信息平台、数字化改革、转型金融和生态产品价值实现机制,为观察绿色信息信用化过程提供了较完整的省域材料。同时,绿色信用体系建设仍面临信息边界不清、评价机制不稳、应用边界不明和权利约束不足等问题。据此,应围绕信息边界、评价机制、应用边界和权利约束四个层次优化制度安排。
绿色信用体系;环境信用监管;信用评价;信用治理;绿色金融;浙江实践
The green credit system is a credit governance arrangement formed against the background of green and low-carbon transformation. Its core issue is how green performance can be transformed into verifiable, explainable and usable credit signals through information collection, credit-based processing and scenario application. Existing research mainly discusses the policy effects of green credit, environmental credit supervision and corporate green innovation, but pays insufficient attention to the conversion mechanism of green credit information among public credit, financial credit and market credit. Based on information asymmetry theory, institutional economics and social credit governance theory, this paper proposes an analytical chain of "green performance—information collection—credit-based processing—evaluation formation—scenario application—behavioral feedback". The study argues that the green credit system is not merely a green add-on to general corporate credit evaluation, but an extension of the boundary of credit information, evaluation logic and application scope. The Zhejiang case shows that green finance reform pilot zones, public credit information platforms, digital reform, transition finance and the value realization mechanism of ecological products provide relatively complete provincial-level materials for observing the credit-based transformation of green information. Meanwhile, the construction of the green credit system still faces problems such as unclear information boundaries, unstable evaluation mechanisms, ambiguous application boundaries and insufficient rights constraints. Accordingly, institutional arrangements should be optimized around four levels: information boundary, evaluation mechanism, application boundary and rights constraints.
green credit system; environmental credit supervision; credit evaluation; credit governance; green finance; Zhejiang practice
何杰. 从绿色信息到信用信号:绿色信用体系的征信逻辑与制度优化——基于浙江实践[J]. 人文与社会科学学刊. 2026, 2 (11): 1-9. DOI: 10.70693/202610074920.
何杰. (2026). 从绿色信息到信用信号:绿色信用体系的征信逻辑与制度优化——基于浙江实践. 人文与社会科学学刊, 2 (11), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.70693/202610074920