当前位置:人文与社会科学学刊 > 2026年9月-2卷9期 > 文章详情
Open Access
PDF 本期PDF

应急状态下公民基本权利限制问题研究

A Study on the Restriction of Citizens' Fundamental Rights in States of Emergency

作者:张心宇
单位:苏州大学
卷期:2026年9月-2卷9期
页码:19-25
发布时间:2026-09-10
总浏览量:121

摘要

应急状态下国家权力特别是行政权力往往会延伸至通常属于公民自治的领域,触发人们对于公民尊严与社会福祉的思考,权力与权利这对张力关系进入公众讨论视野,在宪法框架内重新理解这对张力关系对于推进我国国家治理能力和治理体系现代化具有重要意义。应急状态下公权力相比于常态下有所扩展,公民基本权利需要做出相应让步,主要表现为权力行使主体的扩大、权力行使内容的扩展以及公民自由权、隐私权、财产权等基本权利的限制。基于对人性善恶、权利性质、公私权益等的合理考量,应急状态下国家权力限制公民基本权利有其正当性根源。但为了避免公共权力的过度行使和公民权利的过分缩减,应当将公权扩张和权利限制控制在一定限度之内。明确这一界限是构建应急状态法治体系的前提和核心。应依据法律保留原则提供权利限制的依据,以不得侵犯本质内容原则划清权利限制的范围和底线,以比例原则规范权利限制的程度,为公权扩张提供明确而有效的法律指引,使其在法治轨道内有序运行。

关键词

应急状态;基本权利;权利限制;权利保障

Abstract

In emergency situations, state power, especially administrative power, often extends to areas that usually fall under the autonomy of citizens, triggering people's thinking on the dignity of citizens and social well-being. The tension between power and rights has entered the field of public discussion. Re-understanding the tension between power and rights within the framework of the Constitution is of great significance for promoting the modernization of China's national governance capacity and governance system. Compared with the normal state, the public power in the emergency state has expanded, and the basic rights of citizens need to make corresponding concessions, which are mainly manifested in the expansion of the subject of power exercise, the expansion of the content of power exercise, and the restriction of basic rights such as civil freedom, privacy, and property rights. Based on the reasonable consideration of the good and evil of human nature, the nature of rights, public and private rights and interests, the state power to restrict the basic rights of citizens in the emergency state has its legitimate root. However, in order to avoid the excessive exercise of public power and the excessive reduction of civil rights, the expansion of public power and the restriction of rights should be controlled within a certain limit. Clarifying this boundary is the premise and core of building the emergency rule of law system. It is necessary to provide the basis for the limitation of rights according to the principle of legal reservation, to define the scope and bottom line of the limitation of rights according to the principle of non-infringement of essential content, to regulate the extent of the limitation of rights according to the principle of proportionality, to provide clear and effective legal guidance for the expansion of public rights, so as to make it run orderly within the orbit of the rule of law.

Keywords

emergency state;fundamental rights;restriction of right;protection of right

引用本文

张心宇. 应急状态下公民基本权利限制问题研究[J]. 人文与社会科学学刊. 2026, 2 (9): 19-25. DOI: 10.70693/202608229154.

APA引用

张心宇. (2026). 应急状态下公民基本权利限制问题研究. 人文与社会科学学刊, 2 (9), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.70693/202608229154

参考文献

[1]CecilT,Carr.CrisisLegislationinGreatBritain[J].ColumbiaLawReview,1940,XI:1324-1345.
[2][法]卢梭.社会契约论[M].何兆武,译.北京:商务印书馆,1980:260.
[3]万高隆,罗志坚.法治视角下公权力与私权利的冲突与平衡[J].江西行政学院学报,2012,15(2):14.
[4]韩震.论人文科学就是历史科学[J].青海社会科学,1995(06):47-51.
[5][德]卡尔·马克思.马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷)[M],北京:人民出版社,1972:20.
[6][美]约翰·罗尔斯.《正义论》[M].何怀宏,何包刚,廖申白,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:241.
[7]北京大学法学院司法研究中心.宪法的精神[M].北京:中国方正出版社,2003:11.
[8]刘志刚.限制抑或形成:论关涉基本权利法律之功能的二元性[J].河南政法管理干部学院学报,2005(6):60-65.
[9][法]孟德斯鸠.《论法的精神》(上册)[M].张雁深,译.商务印书馆,1982:34.
[10][英]A·J·M·米尔恩.人的权利与人的多样性——人权哲学[M].夏勇,张志铭,译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1995:54.
[11][日]芦部信喜,高桥和之.宪法[M].林来梵等译.北京:北京大学出版社,2006:18.
[12]郭道晖.法的时代挑战[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,2003:351.
[13][德]史塔克.法学、宪法法院审判权与基本权利[M].许宗力等译.台北:元照出版公司,2006:5
CC BY 本文依据 知识共享署名 4.0 国际许可协议 授权发布。允许他人在署名原作者及来源的前提下复制、传播和使用本文。

编辑部微信

回到顶部