切换期刊

期刊栏目

刊期目次

查看全部 >

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据：

当前位置：人文与社会科学学刊 > 2026年8月-2卷8期 > 文章详情

Open Access Article

格吕克《阿勒山》与《阿弗尔诺》中的反挽歌书写

Louise Glück’s Anti-Elegy in Ararat and Averno

作者：江涵伟

单位：北京外国语大学英语学院

卷期：2026年8月-2卷8期

DOI：10.70693/202607144835

页码：189-193

发布时间：2026-08-06

总浏览量：197

摘要

当代挽歌中，美国诺奖诗人露易丝·格吕克的后现代式哀悼蕴含着深受斯多葛主义影响的冷峻。她拒绝浪漫主义式的慰藉与抒情感伤，倾覆了传统挽歌的宣泄逻辑。本文以《阿勒山》与《阿弗尔诺》两部诗集为研究对象，考察格吕克如何在私人哀悼与公共创伤之间，发展出一种具有后现代意义的反挽歌书写。《阿勒山》作为其最具自传色彩的诗集之一，集中呈现个体死亡经验；而写于“9·11”事件之后的《阿弗尔诺》，则将个体创伤扩展为一种悬置于历史与神话之间的集体哀悼形式。格吕克以刻意节制、近乎冷峻的语言风格，将挽歌重塑为一种铭刻创伤记忆的诗学实践，而非情感宣泄或超验救赎的中介。

关键词

露易丝·格吕克；哀悼；反挽歌；“9·11”；记忆

Abstract

Throughout the contemporary writing of elegy, Louise Glück’s postmodern mourning is tinged with her stoic poetics of austerity. Her poems dismantle traditional elegiac forms by refusing both consolation and lyric sentimentality. This paper seeks to explore such an elegiac writing through her mourning in collections Ararat (1990), one of Louise Glück’s most autobiographical collections on familial tensions, and Averno (2006), a post-9/11 volume in which individual trauma swells into that of a communal one. Rather than presenting trauma as a narrative of personal triumph or growth, Ararat and Averno both mourn through the refusal to deny trauma in different ways—bareness and substitution, tracing death and the violence embedded in it and deeming trauma as an immutable fact. Thus, the Romanticist’s transcendence remains deferred, not realized in her mourning. Ultimately, Glück’s elegiac poems function not to heal, but to hold space for the unhealable. By seeing through the illusions of sentimental healing, Glück challenges the elegiac tradition in a form of witness: one that neither commemorates nor resolves, but starkly defers and suspends.

Keywords

Louise Glück; mourning; (anti-)elegy; “9·11”; memory

下载PDF

引用本文

江涵伟. 格吕克《阿勒山》与《阿弗尔诺》中的反挽歌书写[J]. 人文与社会科学学刊. 2026, 2 (8): 189-193. DOI: 10.70693/202607144835.

APA引用

江涵伟. (2026). 格吕克《阿勒山》与《阿弗尔诺》中的反挽歌书写. 人文与社会科学学刊, 2 (8), 189-193. https://doi.org/10.70693/202607144835

参考文献

[1] Baker, Robert. “Versions of Ascesis in Louise Glück’s Poetry.” The Cambridge Quarterly, vol. 47, no. 2, 2018, pp. 131-54.
[2] Morris, Daniel. The Poetry of Louise Glück: A Thematic Introduction. U of Missouri P, 2006.
[3] Azcuy, Mary Kate. “Persona, Trauma and Survival in Louise Glück’s Postmodern, Mythic, Twenty-First-Century ‘October’.” Crisis and Contemporary Poetry, edited by Ann Karhio, Sean Crosson, and Charles Armstrong, Macmillan, 2011, pp. 33-49.
[4] Weisman, Karen, editor. The Oxford Handbook of the Elegy. Oxford UP, 2010.
[5] Ramazani, Jahan. Poetry of Mourning: The Modern Elegy from Hardy to Heaney. U of Chicago P, 1994.
[6] Spargo, R. Clifton. “The Contemporary Anti-Elegy.” The Oxford Handbook of the Elegy, edited by Karen Weisman, Oxford UP, 2010, pp. 444-61.
[7] Watterson, William C. “Nation and History: The Emergence of the English Pastoral Elegy.” The Oxford Handbook of the Elegy, edited by Karen Weisman, Oxford UP, 2010, pp. 145-62.
[8] Hammond, Jeffrey. “New World Frontiers: The American Puritan Elegy.” The Oxford Handbook of the Elegy, edited by Karen Weisman, Oxford UP, 2010, pp. 221-39.
[9] Costello, Bonnie. “Fresh Woods: Elegy and Ecology among the Ruins.” The Oxford Handbook of the Elegy, edited by Karen Weisman, Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 346-65.
[10] Glück, Louise. Poems 1962–2012. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2012.
[11] Dan, Hansong 但汉松. “暴力改变了我，然后呢？——格吕克《阿弗尔诺》中的后‘9·11’悲悼.” 外国文学, no. 3, 2021, pp. 30-42.
[12] Glück, Louise. Proofs and Theories: Essays on Poetry. Ecco Press, 1994.
[13] Spargo, R. Clifton. The Ethics of Mourning: Grief and Responsibility in Elegiac Literature. Johns Hopkins UP, 2004.
[14] Derrida, Jacques. Memoires for Paul de Man. Translated by Cecile Lindsay, Jonathan Culler, Eduardo Cadava, and Peggy Kamuf, Columbia UP, 1989.
[15] Felman, Shoshana, and Dori Laub. Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History. Routledge, 1992.
[16] Ferguson, Margaret, et al. The Norton Anthology of Poetry, Fifth Edition. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2005.