切换期刊

期刊栏目

刊期目次

查看全部 >

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据：

当前位置：人文与社会科学学刊 > 2026年8月-2卷8期 > 文章详情

Open Access Article

试论进步主义运动对美国水电开发的影响

An Analysis of the Impact of the Progressive Movement on U.S. Hydropower Development

作者：金昱昊

单位：山东师范大学历史文化学院

卷期：2026年8月-2卷8期

DOI：10.70693/202607025887

页码：220-224

发布时间：2026-08-06

总浏览量：264

摘要

进步主义时代是美国承上启下的时代，因此对20世纪后的美国发展产生了长久而深远的影响。进步时代所产生的资源保护主义思想对美国环保运动发展产生了重要作用，而在这种思想的指导下为了合理开发水电而成立的联邦电力委员会也同样发挥着很重要的作用。在进步主义时期，联邦电力委员会由于不是专门机构而且人员多为别处借调，很难履行职责；在20世纪30年代之后，联邦电力委员会成为了独立的机构并且职权范围也得到了扩大，但由于受资源保护主义思想指导以及为应对电力短缺问题，联邦电力委员会往往采取了唯电力利益至上的水电开发原则，而忽视或轻视其他非电力价值；但随着现代环保运动的兴起，20世纪60年代中期后，联邦电力委员会逐渐转向了兼顾多种用途开发。1977年联邦电力委员会转变为联邦能源管理委员会对当今美国电力开发中仍发挥着重要作用。因此，进步主义运动对美国水电开发产生了深远的影响。

关键词

进步主义运动；资源保护主义；联邦电力委员会

Abstract

The Progressive Era was a pivotal period of transition in American history, exerting a long-standing and profound influence on the country’s development throughout the 20th century and beyond. The ideology of conservationism emerging from this era played a crucial role in the evolution of the American environmental movement. Under the guidance of this ideology, the Federal Power Commission (FPC) was established to ensure the rational development of hydropower, occupying a significant position in federal administration. During the Progressive Era, the FPC struggled to fulfill its mandates as it was not yet an independent specialized agency and relied heavily on personnel seconded from other departments. After the 1930s, the FPC was reorganized into an independent regulatory body with expanded jurisdiction. However, driven by conservationist tenets and the need to address power shortages, the Commission often adopted a "power-supremacy" principle in hydropower development, prioritizing electricity generation while marginalizing or neglecting non-power values. With the rise of the modern environmental movement in the mid-1960s, the FPC gradually shifted toward a "multi-purpose" development approach. In 1977, the FPC was succeeded by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which continues to play a vital role in contemporary U.S. energy development. In conclusion, the Progressive Movement has left a deep and enduring imprint on the trajectory of hydropower development in the United States.

Keywords

Progressive Movement; Conservationism; Federal Power Commission

下载PDF

引用本文

金昱昊. 试论进步主义运动对美国水电开发的影响[J]. 人文与社会科学学刊. 2026, 2 (8): 220-224. DOI: 10.70693/202607025887.

APA引用

金昱昊. (2026). 试论进步主义运动对美国水电开发的影响. 人文与社会科学学刊, 2 (8), 220-224. https://doi.org/10.70693/202607025887

参考文献

[1] 李剑鸣. 大转折的年代——美国进步主义运动研究[M].天津:天津教育出版社,1992.
[2] 高芳英. 美国经济结构的变动与进步运动[J].世界历史,1999,(4):112-116.
[3] 王春来. 转型、困惑与出路——美国“进步主义运动”略论[J].华东师范大学学报,2003,(9):71-78+86-124.
[4] 冯伟年. 论美国进步运动的历史背景及其社会影响[J].西北大学学报(哲社版),2001,(5):131-136.
[5] Pinchot, Gifford. The fight for conservation[M].CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform,2010.
[6] 约翰·缪尔. 我们的国家公园[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2012;1-25.
[7] 胡群英. 资源保护和自然保护的首度交锋——20世纪初美国赫奇赫奇争论及其影响[J].世界历史,2006,(3):12-20+159.
[8] U.S. Congress. Act of June 17, 1902[S].United States Statutes at Large,1902,32:388.
[9] U.S. Congress. Federal Water Power Act: Act of June 10, 1920[S].United States Statutes at Large,1920,41:1063,1065,1075.
[10] POLAND S L, et al. A Salute: 75 Years for the FPC and FERC[J].Energy Law Journal,1995,16(2):294-295.
[11] U.S. Congress. An Act to Reorganize the Federal Power Commission[S].United States Statutes at Large,1930,46:797-798.
[12] U.S. Congress. Public Utility Act of 1935[S].United States Statutes at Large,1935,49:847-855,863.
[13] HIRSH R F. Power Loss: The Origins of Deregulation and Restructuring in the American Electric Utility System[M].Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,1999.
[14] FREEMAN J. The Uncomfortable Convergence of Energy and Environmental Law[J]. Harvard Environmental Law Review,2017,41:350.
[15] ALEXANDER C C. Holding the Line: The Eisenhower Era, 1952-1961[M].London: Indiana University Press,1975:103.
[16] 刘绪怡, 韩铁, 李存训. 美国通史:第6卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2002:136.
[17] State of Washington Department of Game v. Federal Power Commission[S].Federal Reporter,1953,207(2):391,395-396.
[18] City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of Tacoma[S].Washington Reports,1953,43(2):468,482-489.
[19] Portland General Electric Co.[S].Federal Power Commission Reports,1951,10:445.
[20] Federal Power Commission v. Oregon[S].United States Reports,1955,349:435.
[21] In re Namekagon Hydro Co.[S].Federal Power Commission Reports,1953,12:203,206.
[22] Namekagon Hydro Co. v. Federal Power Commission[S].Federal Reporter, Second Series,1954,216:509,511-513.
[23] Pacific Northwest Power Co.[S].Federal Power Commission Reports,1964,31:247,259-262,272-273.
[24] LIFSET R D. Power on the Hudson: Storm King Mountain and the Emergence of Modern American Environmentalism[M].Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press,2014.
[25] U.S. Congress. Department of Energy Organization Act[S].United States Statutes at Large,1977,91:565,582-583.